<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MCPD .NET Web Self-Paced Training Kit time estimate summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2-beta2-18055</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n8v.enteuxis.org/?p=270#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I passed the 70-547 exam this morning.  Whew!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This one took me longer to complete than the other two, though I still had plenty of time left over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I used the training kit and the practice exam that came with it.  I found that going through all 280ish questions in Study Mode was an interesting method.  I learned quite a bit I think, but after doing it I couldn&#039;t really measure anything with the practice exams because I remembered over 90% of the questions and could pick out the right answer without having to think through it again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I noticed that I was weak in a few areas, and I think it was because the Training Kit is also weak&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;machineKey -- I&#039;ve never messed with these at all but more than one of my exam questions involved them.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;sticky sessions and Network Load Balancing -- likewise&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;sql caching -- covered in the kit but I probably should have reviewed this more.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But whatever.  Now I&#039;m totally certified on 5+-year-old Microsoft web development practices!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I passed the 70-547 exam this morning.  Whew!</p>

<p>This one took me longer to complete than the other two, though I still had plenty of time left over.</p>

<p>I used the training kit and the practice exam that came with it.  I found that going through all 280ish questions in Study Mode was an interesting method.  I learned quite a bit I think, but after doing it I couldn&#8217;t really measure anything with the practice exams because I remembered over 90% of the questions and could pick out the right answer without having to think through it again.</p>

<p>I noticed that I was weak in a few areas, and I think it was because the Training Kit is also weak</p>

<ul>
<li>machineKey &#8212; I&#8217;ve never messed with these at all but more than one of my exam questions involved them.</li>
<li>sticky sessions and Network Load Balancing &#8212; likewise</li>
<li>sql caching &#8212; covered in the kit but I probably should have reviewed this more.</li>
</ul>

<p>But whatever.  Now I&#8217;m totally certified on 5+-year-old Microsoft web development practices!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n8v.enteuxis.org/?p=270#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I forgot to mention that I passed the 70-528 exam last month.  I was sure when I hit the final submit button that I had failed, but I passed!  Anyway, the training kit and practice exams seem to be enough to get me there.  I really don&#039;t have a lot of real-world experience with it yet, but have been working through the labs.  I am using .NET at work, but the certification precedes the experience :D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot to mention that I passed the 70-528 exam last month.  I was sure when I hit the final submit button that I had failed, but I passed!  Anyway, the training kit and practice exams seem to be enough to get me there.  I really don&#8217;t have a lot of real-world experience with it yet, but have been working through the labs.  I am using .NET at work, but the certification precedes the experience <img src='http://n8v.enteuxis.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n8v.enteuxis.org/?p=270#comment-867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Errata for the 70-528 book:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930739&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Errata for 70-547:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941491&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errata for the 70-528 book:
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930739" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930739</a></p>

<p>Errata for 70-547:
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941491" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941491</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n8v.enteuxis.org/?p=270#comment-866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I passed the first exam (70-536) on Wednesday.  It was only 40 questions (it said some of them were &quot;beta&quot; questions they are testing and would not contribute to the score).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I read the book, did the labs (but not the extra practice suggestions), and used the practice tests that came with the training kit to prepare.  I was glad that the practice tests gave me an idea of which of the 7 subject areas I needed to improve.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This was my first Microsoft exam so I didn&#039;t know quite what to expect.  A few small surprises:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;the real questions were not any better quality than the practice questions.  There were several that were unclear.  There was one where none of the code samples in the answer strictly matched the description in the question, and another where I was pretty sure all the answers were broken (but I may have just been ignorant).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did well on the real exam in areas where I knew I was weak, and did less well on areas on which I was strong in the practice tests.  Huh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The questions requiring more than one answer on the real exam had the number of answers (&quot;pick two answers&quot;) clearly spelled out.  That made them (seem) easier than the ones on the practice test where I would sometimes click two obvious ones and forget a third or something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;There were some differences in emphasis.  My real exam, if I remember correctly, didn&#039;t have any questions about regular expressions, though the practice tests covered them heavily.  Too bad that was one of my strong suits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But anyway, I passed.  On to the 70-528 course.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I passed the first exam (70-536) on Wednesday.  It was only 40 questions (it said some of them were &#8220;beta&#8221; questions they are testing and would not contribute to the score).</p>

<p>I read the book, did the labs (but not the extra practice suggestions), and used the practice tests that came with the training kit to prepare.  I was glad that the practice tests gave me an idea of which of the 7 subject areas I needed to improve.</p>

<p>This was my first Microsoft exam so I didn&#8217;t know quite what to expect.  A few small surprises:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>the real questions were not any better quality than the practice questions.  There were several that were unclear.  There was one where none of the code samples in the answer strictly matched the description in the question, and another where I was pretty sure all the answers were broken (but I may have just been ignorant).</p></li>
<li><p>I did well on the real exam in areas where I knew I was weak, and did less well on areas on which I was strong in the practice tests.  Huh.</p></li>
<li><p>The questions requiring more than one answer on the real exam had the number of answers (&#8220;pick two answers&#8221;) clearly spelled out.  That made them (seem) easier than the ones on the practice test where I would sometimes click two obvious ones and forget a third or something.</p></li> 
<li><p>There were some differences in emphasis.  My real exam, if I remember correctly, didn&#8217;t have any questions about regular expressions, though the practice tests covered them heavily.  Too bad that was one of my strong suits.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>But anyway, I passed.  On to the 70-528 course.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://n8v.enteuxis.org/2009/08/mcpd-net-web-self-paced-training-kit-time-estimate-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://n8v.enteuxis.org/?p=270#comment-831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... to do all the labs takes me longer than the estimates here, especially if I run into any trouble.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another essential:  There are 4 pages of errata, see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935218/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; to do all the labs takes me longer than the estimates here, especially if I run into any trouble.</p>

<p>Another essential:  There are 4 pages of errata, see <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935218/" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935218/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

